Investing in gold, yes or no?

Is it a good idea to invest in gold? At this time I found two quite substantiated opinions about investing in gold. Both are by people who I think are experts on the subject and I do not have a secondary interest in the subject. So I find it interesting to hear.

On one side in favor of investing in gold is Marc Garrigasat, the blog author Investors Conundrum and president of the Koala Capital SICAV. According to Marc Gold is the true currency of payment of the planet universally accepted, is much older and is not affected by debt that may have taken the issuing state.

On the other side is that of John Reed, author of several books and articles on real estate investment in the United States and one about protecting the savings in bad times. He says that gold is a bad asset to hedge against inflation. Although he recognized advantages such as high density value, says that gold holds its value can lower long-term, and that in the future end up losing because value is above its historical average inflation-adjusted.

In full crisis investing in gold this who would be at the whim of rich sound, but we must also recognize that the turbulence and the high price of it are causing many mediates class people engaged in buying gold, no more than see the shops and businesses that have emerged, some of them with great success and attention given by the media. In fact it has spoken to install gold vending machines . All this without counting the movements of large investors (investment funds, banks, etc.) that are around gold.

Who is right? Should we sell everything we have and buy yellow metal or should we invest in other intangible assets? Personally I think the future imagined by each of the persons mentioned is different, and the period in which the investments contemplated. Meanwhile asks readers? Invest in gold or invest in gold?

The most profitable mutual funds 2012 , Hedge funds.

I found it very interesting annual returns are able to get the big hedge funds, also known as the most profitable investment funds in the world.   We understand how big hedge funds who manage more than 1,000 million dollars. In the list we have the 100 with better performance in 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12) and we can compare it with the result obtained in the previous year (2,011).
In the list we can see that most of Hedge Funds exceeds 1,000 million managed and some 5,000 million. The best-performing hedge funds have gained hover between 20% and 40%, which is not bad considering the vast amounts of capital managed.
In this post I put the list of the top 12, with photo of the manager and all data relating to the company, the name of the fund, the strategy used and the yields obtained. The full list of the 100 best in the big hedge funds you have it here .

1st. Background: Metacapital Mortgage Opportunities . Manager: Deepak Narula. Location: USA.
Company: Metacapital Management. Strategy: Mortgage-backed arbitrage
Managed capital: 1,500 million
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 37.8%
Performance in the year 2011: 23.6%

2nd. Background: Pine River Fixed Income. Manager: Steve Kuhn. Location: USA.
Company: Pine River Capital Management. Strategy: Mortgage-backed arbitrage
Managed capital: 3.600 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 32.9%
Performance in the year 2011: 4.8%

3rd. Background: CQS Directional Opportunities. manager Michael Hintze
Company: CQS. Location: UK Strategy: Multistrategy
Managed capital: 1.500 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 28.9%
Performance in the year 2011: -10.4%

4th. Background: Pine River Liquid Mortgage . Manager: Steve Kuhn. Location: USA
Company: Chen Jiayi Pine River Capital Management. Strategy: Mortgage-backed arbitrage
Managed capital: 1.100 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 28.0%
Performance in the year 2011: 7.2%

5th. Background: Omega Overseas Partners . Manager: Leon Cooperman
Company: Omega Advisors. Location: USA. Strategy: Long / short
Managed capital: 1.400 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 21.7%
Performance in the year 2011: -1.4%

6th. Fund: European Odey. manager: Crispin Odey. Location: UK
Company: Odey Asset Management. Strategy: Macro
Managed capital: 1.800 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 24.1%
Performance in the year 2011: -20.3%

7th. Background: Marathon Securitized Credit . Managers: Bruce Richards, Louis Hanover
Company: Marathon Asset Management. Location: USA. Strategy: Asset backed
Managed capital: 1.200 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 24.0%
Performance in the year 2011: - 4.2%

8th. Background: Palomino . Manager: David Tepper
Company: Appaloosa Management. Location: USA. Strategy: Multistrategy
Managed capital: 4.900 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 24.0%
Performance in the year 2011: -3.5%

9th. Background: BTG Pactual GEMM. Managers: Team managed (Andre Esteves)
Company: BTG Pactual Global Asset Management. Location: USA. Strategy: Macro
Managed capital: 3.600 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 23.1%
Performance in the year 2011: 3.4%

10 °. Fund: Third Point Ultra . Manager: Daniel Loeb
Company: Third Point. Location: USA. Strategy: Multistrategy
Managed capital: 1.300 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 22.1%
Performance in the year 2011: -2.3%

11 º. Background: Seer Capital Partners. Manager: Philip Weingord
Company: Seer Capital Management. Location: USA. Strategy: Asset backed
Managed capital: 1.200 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 21.6%
Performance in the year 2011: 2.1%

12 º. Background: Tiger Global . Managers: Feroz Dewan, Chase Coleman
Company: Tiger Global Management. Location: USA. Strategy: Long / short
Managed capital: 6.000 billion.
Performance in the year 2012 (from 01-01-12 to 31-10-12): 21.0%
Performance in the year 2011: 45.0%

The Compound Interest (part I)

Often one has talked about this on the net. In fact Einstein once said and the power it has is brutal and compared it to the most important laws that came to discover in his time.

Everyone can invest at compound interest is more, everyone should invest in this way.

The only concept that you have to hold in your mind is that the interest earned on the investment, whatever, have to be reinvested. If you get X amount take an additional 10% for your next investment will be in X amount plus 10%, and so on.

 











Each time you will be investing a larger amount, and over the years you might have considerable capital.

A clear example of safe investment, how deposits, can be combined with compound interest, a powerful tool to raise capital face higher.

You just need to have two things: time and patience. With the very fact continuously reinvest our capital interest is increasing and if you also add fruit saving periodic contributions and the issue is more interesting.

It is clear that the more interest you can get faster increase our capital, but since most people do not want to take greater risks, take for good the interest that we can offer a bank or, how are all the rage now, some bonds autonomous. Although there are many other options how large corporations that offer senior notes, for example, at a good interest and security of solvency.

Well, what we were going. An initial capital plus an acceptable interest and adding a regular savings result gives how, over time, a capital that many do not even have arisen in life.

In the next part of the article we will make a realistic example of how awesome it is compound interest, and never too late to start, but since one of the requirements asked of us is the time because the sooner we start better, more joys reach have.

An advance is not difficult to reach € 300,000.

Equities vs. fixed income

We want to invest but do not know where to start. We heard that a neighbor buys shares, another has-bills ... but it sounds like Chinese. The most common among the ordinary people, not familiar with the investment world is to know the stock exchange. Equities bag not associated with on many occasions.

If we go a step further, on the other side of the sidewalk, no bonds. Four out of five people questioned in the street has never heard of the bonds, but the bonds of state and treasury bills.

There is a lack of knowledge of concepts and the association has to be clear that equity = stock exchange = buy / sell shares on an exchange.

And fixed income = letters / bonds / debentures, although in this case it is not so easy to explain as above.

I am often asked which is better, if the fixed or variable?, is an open question as it is not a duel to be the best way to invest, but every one of the options requires a plan or strategy determined and made ​​to measure.

By email I have received a comment on why equities RECOMMEND even. I have to say that I've never done, just position myself where best suits me and I adapt to the rules of the game on the fly. Who else who ever invested less in stock, if not he will have done so indirectly through your bank in a structured deposit or a mutual fund. Of all the people who have bought shares being aware of what they did, probably 8 out of 10 will have lost money, have won something and that ten will be made ​​in August. It's pure statistics. To earn a few most be missed.

The bag is fascinating. But never an individual investor may invest to a "higher level" because just as fascinating is equally manipulable. If I want to buy shares of Google I can do with a few mouse clicks. I can think that the company is "on fire" and that will go far. But managers may hedge funds, pension funds and large investment funds do not think the same and withdraw their positions. In that case the action begin letting down caught out if I have not heard before, either by choice or by the use of a stop loss (stop loss).

The strategy followed by these three groups of investors is quite simple in concept. They come in solid companies with good growth and the mere fact of having a reputation draws lots of people, and I do not mean people like you and me (also), but managers and smaller funds and large investors capital private. When the action is "hot" is said, the great go through the back door, by stealth, reaping the benefits and leaving others with an action that is devalued by simply taking away a part of its value . This happens every day, and is to blame for that 8 out of 10 of us lose money in stock market.

If you look at a recent case we can see if Apple / Google. The first was the world's most powerful company, shares more than 700 usd and bank account filled to the brim, to say nothing of the benefits you get. Until one day a great manager decides he has had enough and leaves, of course others are wary and follow him. There is no reason. Humans are like dogs when you shoot with a stick.

Source | Yahoo! Finance

So where has the money gone? Much of it directly to Google. In six months is up 40% to more than 900 usd per share, your business is going well or very well, but Apple is stronger and gets more benefits. And the box (cash money) is several times larger than that of the search engine block. But the funds are positioned in the search, making skyrocket while Apple already looks like 700 usd far and passes through a discrete (to be what it is) 400 usd.

Source | Yahoo! Finance

Until some lit, some other privileged information worldwide leading company, decides to abandon positions. The action will begin to lose because it is what makes the law of supply and demand. If a site is removed as there are less.

With fixed income this can not happen in this measure. Market does not work like this. As much as the bond is not fixed for the purpose of this type of investment is not the same. In this market, commonly, it comes knowing what is going to win, and although we can speculate without any problem, large funds do not use this method. In this market, which we are most knowing the outcome. Knowing that the current uncertainty is no reason for you to lose money, and if all goes well I will recover the initial capital plus interest at maturity.

Clearly positioning myself for fixed income, but that does not mean they do not use the equity (if I use it) but I move into what best suits my investment method.

I see it like a business. Imagine you are the manager of a company and you have two possible scenarios for the end of year results. Think of your choice dependent jobs. On one side of the table is the aggressive option (the reference to equities), this option is as follows: if the thing goes well the company will earn a 25% in this fiscal year. If something goes wrong the company will lose 15% and you have to make a cut of 30% of the workforce.

Across the table is the most relaxed (relating to bonds), in that you will not lose in that year but the benefits will not 8%.

Which do you prefer?

Sure you reflect on this example you have decided that the bond is better. No, not better. It's different. It is used for different things. It depends on your plan and your ambition. Not the same winning by 8% to 25%, but it is the same to win by 8% to lose 15%.

Quite some time I am in favor of adding 8 at 8, and not from adding 25 +10 -15 -8. I hope you understand. I am more than convinced that long-term earning just over fixed income than equities.

Just to give an example, a well-known blog (I will not say the name), which have a public investment portfolio. Since 2008, have achieved 16% revalue. A 16% cumulative, then dividing by the years from the start date is plus or minus 3%.

  In fixed income, and without being a "master business" minimum multiply that number by two.

This is not to say it's easy and those who invest in equities fools. Not at all. Only that each tool is used to a certain way of working.

Bank deposit. You know how it works?

When hiring a bank deposit must look at several things and although it seems to be the easiest investment there, it is not the end of the post and I will tell you that if it is, we have to fix on the characteristics of product we hired, mostly to give us for a ride and at the end we get on a good scare and anger.

Before everything. A bank deposit, fixed term or fixed-term deposit is the same. You will leave some money to the bank to do its thing and he in return gives you a interest as compensation. It has a fixed duration and fixed remuneration contract is fixed, ie before entering already know what you're going to win. They are also guaranteed by the state (FGD) 100,000 per entity and person in case of bank failure.

This strong interest is mainly governed by the Euribor (interest rate to lend money to, including, entities) but with the whole issue of the crisis the illiquidity of banks have had to forget the taxes low interest rates by the European Central Bank (ECB) and make aggressive campaigns to individual customers a higher interest rate.

While official interest rates are at 1% banks are paying them to liabilities with 4.6% APR and without any connection from the client.

We will explain in more understandable words what the previous sentence. THE European Central Bank fixed in 1% the interest rate at which it lends money to banks, that is, that when you decide to open a window of liquidity to banks in need come to him to refinance because only charged 1% APR, which is very little.

But as always there are windows of liquidity banks must ingéniaselas to get more money and this is where the competition starts to get money from ordinary citizens.

Clearly, there are many people who prefer not to earn a little extra to have to change banks but there are many people and with real money if you are willing to move to earn more.

Therefore, the most interest is willing to offer, in theory, is the one with more numbers to get more funding. (Although other factors influence how the country of origin of the entity, rating rating and even if you drop close to home or if you are good at managing the Internet).

Once we are clear because there are going to explain bank deposits which typically offer entities and that we'll be looking.

There are several types of deposits but of course we say that we are interested only pure and hard deposits without additional links, no credit, no insurance, or payroll or anything.

Being a low-risk investment, and suitable for every investor profiles, we can see that the investment triangle occupy a very relaxed site to be a liquid investment, low risk and therefore unprofitable.

Investing in this way we will not get rich but how low we will not lose money, and I say now lose because if you go to a lot of companies and they offer a lower interest rate to 3% and enter missing. So clear.

If you want a band inflation eats it otherwise you better grab your money and spend it how you will at least give pleasure.

We also have to look at whether the associated account where interest is exempt receive commissions or we will charge between 6 and 20 euros per year. Thing that still remains for the low profitability that we provide.

Now we are chastened and they do but you have to be careful that we do not give any kind of product then selling costs or recover the money, you can leereste article preferred to go deeper on the subject.

Remember that the bank is to serve. 's not your friend , and if not keep his promises or not treating you how you deserve there are dozens of them scattered throughout the geography.

As a final conclusion and summary say that everyone who has "some" money should try to get some performance to keep purchasing power and try to at least get something "extra". Do not be charging for anything and remember that it is you who is indebted to the bank money and not leaving you giving interests.

Finally, always read the fine print to take no surprises.

Indeed, investment is simpler than having no money at home. In contrast is the least profitable of all but ultimately is an investment at 0% APR.

I hope this clarification have no hesitation in going to the bank to make "some investment" and if you do not hesitate to contact me.

The 12 principles of value investing (Part 2)

As I mentioned last week the principles are based on ideas large investment managers such as Peter Lynch, Warren Buffett, Mario Gabelli, Charlie Munger, John Templeton, John Neff, Jim Rogers, Christopher H. Browne, Friedrich A. Von Hayek, Walter Schloss, Benjamin Graham and Francisco Garcia Paramés himself. These principles are contained in a book edited by Bestinver funds and summarized weekly by people.
Here we go with the following six principles:
7) Having a bad short-term behavior is inevitable: John Neff (1931) once said that "it is not always easy to invest in what is popular, but it is the way to get outstanding returns." Thus, less popular investments can generate short-term returns ill to stand in longer periods of tiempo.Por Therefore, choosing an investment manager for their results in the short term (less than 3 years) may lead to making the wrong decision, as the short-term outcome is not a good indicator of successful long. A study of Brandes on global equity funds reveals that, while the 7 best fund managers significantly beat the market over a period of 10 years, all had a worse performance than the benchmark for short periods of time.
8) It's not worth guided by economic forecasts: The co-founder of Quantum Fund Jim Rogers (1942) stated that "to be successful investing is necessary to go soon, when things are cheap, when there is panic, when everyone is demoralized ". Investors tend to follow the macroeconomic forecasts when investing, but the correlation between the stock market and the economy is much weaker than it may seem. So it's much more productive to devote every effort to the analysis of companies. It is also important to remember that economic forecasting is a very complicated task where mistakes outnumber the successes. The predictions of the analysts on the quarterly results of companies, according to a study by David Dreman, was erroneous in 75% of the time up to 10% on the quarterly results. Therefore not worth spending time and energy to the analysis of short-term variables totally uncontrollable as GDP, interest rates, the level of stock market indices or the company's quarterly results.
9) Do not invest in companies never overrated: One of the worst decisions of long-term investment is to buy shares overvalued because euphoria fashion sector or stock, as happened with Japan in the 90s, in which the country experienced the greatest speculative bubble twentieth century, when the real estate value was multiplied by 75 and the value of the stock by 100. The most dramatic case is that of the Nasdaq market that slumped 80% in less than three years, dragging millions of investors lose 99% of your investment. Many of these investors will take decades to recover your investment or just not ever recover. The most recent overvaluation has been in China's stock market, the index traded as at 40 times profit.
10) Do not let emotions guide your investment decisions: Benjamin Graham (1894-1976), economist and investor and pioneer of value investing, once said that "getting good returns is easier than people think. Get outstanding performance is much harder than people imagine. " And all because among the greatest challenges of a power inverter is staying true to its investment philosophy, never letting emotions dictate your decisions. And they usually do at the worst time, ignoring the famous board Buffet: "Be fearful when others are greedy and become greedy when everyone is afraid." In this sense, the statistics are revealing: in the last 20 years, the average profit of American funds in the stock market and 11.6%, however, the average profit Inverter U.S. equity funds is as only 4.5%. One of the most paradoxical is the famous Magellan Fund Peter Lynch, whose investors earned on average 5% annualized when performance that had the fund over 14 years was 29 % per year.
The causes of "self-destructive behavior" of the investor are many: to be guided by fear or ambition, invest in the fashion or not stay true to his philosophy. But above all highlights the general trend is the investor to try to predict the short term movement of the stock.
11) Do not try to predict the movement of the stock in the short term: According to the legendary American investor Walter Schloss (1916), "shyness generated by past failures causes most investors lost major bull markets." As described by Peter Lynch in his book "One Up on Wall Street", in late 1972, when the stock was about to suffer one of the worst crashes in history, optimism was at its highest point (85% of advisors were bullish as reported by Investor's Intelligence). At the beginning of the market rebound in 1974, 65% of advisors feared that the worst was yet to come. Again, before the fall of the stock market in 1977, 90% of advisors were bullish. At the start of big climb which took the market in 1982, more than half of the advisers predicted downs and just before the crash of 1987, 80% thought that the market would continue to rise. Lynch perfectly illustrates how difficult it is to predict the movement of stock markets.
Although long-term performance of any stock market approaches a constant 10%, yields on short-term stock market are asymmetric. A common tendency is to give investors their investment plan out of the market in the hope of re-entry when the environment is more favorable.
12) Patience is the main virtue of the successful investor: And, according to Francisco Garcia Paramés, investment director Bestinver AM, "the most fascinating of value investing is that time always works in your favor." Active Stocks are ideal for long-term get rich. Xigen But quality and less common among investors: patience. To achieve satisfactory performance in the stock market you need to have enough stamina to stay invested, sometimes even uncomfortable. Keep in mind that the U.S. stock market has provided positive returns to 5 years in 97% of cases. The market rewards the patient investor who stays true to their investment strategy, said in Bestinver. The Value Investing depends more on common sense, daily work and patience that individual sources of information or the prediction of future events. Its correct application minimizes the possibility of permanent losses in the portfolio and has produced positive results in the long run, beating the average market returns.
And this concludes the summary of the principles of value investing. This Saturday we are in 7th Rankia meeting where I am available to you all.
A greeting.

The 12 principles of value investing (Part 1)

Bestinver has published a book that summarizes the 12 principles of management by value, with phrases and ideas of legendary managers who follow this philosophy, such as Peter Lynch, Warren Buffett, Mario Gabelli, Charlie Munger, John Templeton, John Neff, Jim Rogers, Christopher H. Browne, Walter Schloss or Francisco Garcia Paramés own. Joining them are two prominent figures Friedrich A. Von Hayek, Nobel laureate in economics and Benjamin Graham driver of investment value.
I put a short summary has been published weekly funds people, each one of these ideas:
1) The active equity is more profitable in the long term: Peter Lynch (1944), Magellan fund manager, once said that "the great advantage of investing in stocks, for those who accept the uncertainty, is the extraordinary reward for having reason. " From 1871-1992 and in spite of all bankruptcies, recessions and crises, stocks outperformed bonds in 80% of periods of 10 years and 100% of 30-year periods. Moreover, equities has resulted thirty times more profitable than bonds. The explanation is that when you buy shares you are buying a part of a business and is therefore part of its growth and expansion. "The bond investor is only the nearest source of money and the best we can hope for is to get it back with interest," says Bestinver AM on publication.
Real estate assets also increase the purchasing power of long-term investor, but not as consistent as stocks. As for raw materials, possibly the worst real asset returns over the long term due to its high cyclicality.
2) active equity is less risky in the long term: Indeed, and although it may seem paradoxical, the target equity is less risky to invest long-term, since its evolution is linked to economic growth and corporate profits . Instead government bonds depend on economic policies governments adopt q ue corresponding, often inflationary and therefore destructive of value to those "nominal assets" that do not incorporate price inflation. As an example, draws Bestinver Argentine investors. The investor in Argentine government bonds in 2001 lost 70% of their savings and have not since recovered, while the initial equity investor lost 60% in the same year and then not only recover quickly, but multiply by nine investment in five years. Moreover, the Argentine bond is approximately the same price as marked at the outset of the crisis. And, according to the manager, history is full of examples of very damaging inflationary periods for investors in all types of bonds (Argentina in 2002 and in the 80s and 90s; Russia in the 90s, Spain in the early 70, just as the U.S., or Germany in the 20s).
3) Few managers get beat market indices in the long run: Get an average annual return of over 10% that offers long-term stock market is not easy. In fact only 9% of American managers has managed to outperform the S & P 500 over 16 years (1981-1997). The fundamental reason is Bestinver is "the lack of discipline and the continuous changes of strategy they incur most fund managers", who often succumb to fads and phobias of each moment. Be true to the investment philosophy both in good and in bad times is one of the keys to obtaining a satisfactory long-term performance. History shows that the average fund manager tends to go wrong with your investment decisions and guided heavily by short-term economic forecasts. Thus, the different minima of the bag have been coinciding with maximum liquidity positions equity funds: 1970, 1974, 1982, 1987 and 1990.
4) Investment in setting produces higher returns than the indices in the long run: "All intelligent investing is value investing: buy something for less than it's worth," said Charlie Munger once (1924), vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway . Among the different schools of management, "value investing" is the only one that brings together a group of managers who manage to beat the stock market long term and consistently. According to investment firm Ibbotson Associates, value investing has overtaken from a differential growth rate of 5% since 1932.
It is estimated that the investment value concentrates only between 5% and 10% of world capitalization by 200 managers, especially in North America and investors have achieved this common philosophy beat the market long term, although each with its own strategy.
5) The volatility and liquidity of an action are not representative of the risk: Friedrich A. Von Hayek (1899-1992), once said that "Wall Street used the CAPM model and other ways to reduce the uncertainty to a quantifiable risk. But only measure what is measurable, no matter what. " Thus, the risk that an investor takes when investing in shares is not determined by the volatility that has been in the past, but by the possibility of a permanent loss of value associated with the business of the company. Thus a volatile trading does not make a firm more risky but allows the investor to buy it at a time when the alteration between value and price is higher.
Neither the size or liquidity risk is representative, because in principle it is always easier to find major differences between value and price in small companies than in blue chips, as they are less analyzed. In fact, it has been shown that small caps are more profitable than large firms in the long run, but not necessarily more risky.
6) The stock market crises are inevitable and allow a significant value creation: As John Templeton (1912-2007), philanthropist and founder of Templeton Funds Financial, "the four most dangerous words in investment history to have been: this time is different. " Although the long-term actions are most profitable assets and secure, the history of the stock market is full of dramatic episodes. The value investor has to understand that uncertainty will always be present when investing in stocks, as strong or scilaciones are inherent to the market and investment strategy based on these oscillations is a mistake in the long term. However, staying true to the investment strategy during such episodes allows a significant value creation.
In the past 40 years the equity markets have faced several oil crises, many armed conflicts, various financial scandals, bankruptcies thousand and four major stock market crash. And despite everything, the S & P has provided an average annual rate of 9.3% since. Even from the crisis of 29, in less than four years an investor would have earned a higher return than investing in Treasury bills.
In my next article I will comment the last 6 value principles.
A greeting.

The U.S. economy grew 2.4% in the first quarter

Washington, May 30 (Thomson Financial). - The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 2.4% in the first quarter, a tenth less than originally planned, as a result of public spending cuts approved by Congress, especially on defense. However, Commerce Department data released today highlight that consumer spending rebounded in the first three months of the year at a rate of 3.4%, the highest in the past two years. The data is particularly significant in an economy like the U.S., where private consumption accounts for almost 70% of the total Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In its first estimate, the federal agency had estimated GDP growth at 2.5% for the period between January and February. In this way, the U.S. economy recorded over two years of sustained growth, despite its still palpable warmth accelerates its expansion over the last quarter of 2012, when it expanded 0.4%. The U.S. trade balance data also showed positive, with an increase in exports of goods and services by 0.8% compared with a fall of 2.8% reported for the fourth quarter of 2012, and imports which grew by only 1.9 % compared with a decrease of 4.2% in the previous period. Also, the real estate sector seems to consolidate its recovery from the 2008 crisis, and residential fixed investment grew at a rate of 12.1%. As a brake on economic growth, in contrast, behaved steep spending cuts amounting to 85,000 million approved last March to the end of the fiscal year in September 2013. Government spending fell 4.9% compared to 4.1% forecast in the first of three official estimates, with special emphasis on the defense sector which fell by 12.1%, compared with 11, estimated 5% previously. Without these cuts, the U.S. economic growth would have been 3.4% in the quarter. Meanwhile, prices remained controlled behavior, registering a growth of 1% in the annual adjusted, down from 1.6% at the end of last year, let alone the 2% threshold marked by the Federal Reserve ( Fed) U.S.. Although the data show some optimism about the U.S. economic discourse, the truth is that it is too weak to continue lowering the high unemployment rate in the country, which remains a major concern of citizens and which closed April in a 7.5%. In a parallel data released today, the figure weekly esempleo subsidy claims in the U.S. rose by 10,000 and stood at 354,000 last week. Experts valued the good performance of the economy in the context of sharp cuts in public spending, but said that is unlikely to affect the aggressive monetary stimulus policy implemented by the Fed to stimulate growth. In a recent appearance before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, the Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, stated that the policy stimulus including interest rates between 0% and 0.25% and monthly program billionaire bond buying is changed unless finding an economic expansion "continuous and sustainable." The third and final data on U.S. GDP will be released on June 26. MarketWatch

Washington, May 30 (Thomson Financial). - The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 2.4% in the first quarter, a tenth less than originally planned, as a result of public spending cuts approved by Congress, especially on defense. However, Commerce Department data released today highlight that consumer spending rebounded in the first three months of the year at a rate of 3.4%, the highest in the past two years. The data is particularly significant in an economy like the U.S., where private consumption accounts for almost 70% of the total Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In its first estimate, the federal agency had estimated GDP growth at 2.5% for the period between January and February. In this way, the U.S. economy recorded over two years of sustained growth, despite its still palpable warmth accelerates its expansion over the last quarter of 2012, when it expanded 0.4%. The U.S. trade balance data also showed positive, with an increase in exports of goods and services by 0.8% compared with a fall of 2.8% reported for the fourth quarter of 2012, and imports which grew by only 1.9 % compared with a decrease of 4.2% in the previous period. Also, the real estate sector seems to consolidate its recovery from the 2008 crisis, and residential fixed investment grew at a rate of 12.1%. As a brake on economic growth, in contrast, behaved steep spending cuts amounting to 85,000 million approved last March to the end of the fiscal year in September 2013. Government spending fell 4.9% compared to 4.1% forecast in the first of three official estimates, with special emphasis on the defense sector which fell by 12.1%, compared with 11, estimated 5% previously. Without these cuts, the U.S. economic growth would have been 3.4% in the quarter. Meanwhile, prices remained controlled behavior, registering a growth of 1% in the annual adjusted, down from 1.6% at the end of last year, let alone the 2% threshold marked by the Federal Reserve ( Fed) U.S.. Although the data show some optimism about the U.S. economic discourse, the truth is that it is too weak to continue lowering the high unemployment rate in the country, which remains a major concern of citizens and which closed April in a 7.5%. In a parallel data released today, the figure weekly esempleo subsidy claims in the U.S. rose by 10,000 and stood at 354,000 last week. Experts valued the good performance of the economy in the context of sharp cuts in public spending, but said that is unlikely to affect the aggressive monetary stimulus policy implemented by the Fed to stimulate growth. In a recent appearance before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, the Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, stated that the policy stimulus including interest rates between 0% and 0.25% and monthly program billionaire bond buying is changed unless finding an economic expansion "continuous and sustainable." The third and final data on U.S. GDP will be released on June 26. MarketWatch

The U.S. economy grew 2.4% in the first quarter - Expansion.com

Washington, May 30 (Thomson Financial). - The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 2.4% in the first quarter, a tenth less than originally planned, as a result of public spending cuts approved by Congress, especially on defense. However, Commerce Department data released today highlight that consumer spending rebounded in the first three months of the year at a rate of 3.4%, the highest in the past two years. The data is particularly significant in an economy like the U.S., where private consumption accounts for almost 70% of the total Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In its first estimate, the federal agency had estimated GDP growth at 2.5% for the period between January and February. In this way, the U.S. economy recorded over two years of sustained growth, despite its still palpable warmth accelerates its expansion over the last quarter of 2012, when it expanded 0.4%. The U.S. trade balance data also showed positive, with an increase in exports of goods and services by 0.8% compared with a fall of 2.8% reported for the fourth quarter of 2012, and imports which grew by only 1.9 % compared with a decrease of 4.2% in the previous period. Also, the real estate sector seems to consolidate its recovery from the 2008 crisis, and residential fixed investment grew at a rate of 12.1%. As a brake on economic growth, in contrast, behaved steep spending cuts amounting to 85,000 million approved last March to the end of the fiscal year in September 2013. Government spending fell 4.9% compared to 4.1% forecast in the first of three official estimates, with special emphasis on the defense sector which fell by 12.1%, compared with 11, estimated 5% previously. Without these cuts, the U.S. economic growth would have been 3.4% in the quarter. Meanwhile, prices remained controlled behavior, registering a growth of 1% in the annual adjusted, down from 1.6% at the end of last year, let alone the 2% threshold marked by the Federal Reserve ( Fed) U.S.. Although the data show some optimism about the U.S. economic discourse, the truth is that it is too weak to continue lowering the high unemployment rate in the country, which remains a major concern of citizens and which closed April in a 7.5%. In a parallel data released today, the figure weekly esempleo subsidy claims in the U.S. rose by 10,000 and stood at 354,000 last week. Experts valued the good performance of the economy in the context of sharp cuts in public spending, but said that is unlikely to affect the aggressive monetary stimulus policy implemented by the Fed to stimulate growth. In a recent appearance before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, the Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, stated that the policy stimulus including interest rates between 0% and 0.25% and monthly program billionaire bond buying is changed unless finding an economic expansion "continuous and sustainable." The third and final data on U.S. GDP will be released on June 26. MarketWatch

The U.S. economy grew 2.4% in the first quarter - Expansion.com

Washington, May 30 (Thomson Financial). - The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 2.4% in the first quarter, a tenth less than originally planned, as a result of public spending cuts approved by Congress, especially on defense. However, Commerce Department data released today highlight that consumer spending rebounded in the first three months of the year at a rate of 3.4%, the highest in the past two years. The data is particularly significant in an economy like the U.S., where private consumption accounts for almost 70% of the total Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In its first estimate, the federal agency had estimated GDP growth at 2.5% for the period between January and February. In this way, the U.S. economy recorded over two years of sustained growth, despite its still palpable warmth accelerates its expansion over the last quarter of 2012, when it expanded 0.4%. The U.S. trade balance data also showed positive, with an increase in exports of goods and services by 0.8% compared with a fall of 2.8% reported for the fourth quarter of 2012, and imports which grew by only 1.9 % compared with a decrease of 4.2% in the previous period. Also, the real estate sector seems to consolidate its recovery from the 2008 crisis, and residential fixed investment grew at a rate of 12.1%. As a brake on economic growth, in contrast, behaved steep spending cuts amounting to 85,000 million approved last March to the end of the fiscal year in September 2013. Government spending fell 4.9% compared to 4.1% forecast in the first of three official estimates, with special emphasis on the defense sector which fell by 12.1%, compared with 11, estimated 5% previously. Without these cuts, the U.S. economic growth would have been 3.4% in the quarter. Meanwhile, prices remained controlled behavior, registering a growth of 1% in the annual adjusted, down from 1.6% at the end of last year, let alone the 2% threshold marked by the Federal Reserve ( Fed) U.S.. Although the data show some optimism about the U.S. economic discourse, the truth is that it is too weak to continue lowering the high unemployment rate in the country, which remains a major concern of citizens and which closed April in a 7.5%. In a parallel data released today, the figure weekly esempleo subsidy claims in the U.S. rose by 10,000 and stood at 354,000 last week. Experts valued the good performance of the economy in the context of sharp cuts in public spending, but said that is unlikely to affect the aggressive monetary stimulus policy implemented by the Fed to stimulate growth. In a recent appearance before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, the Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, stated that the policy stimulus including interest rates between 0% and 0.25% and monthly program billionaire bond buying is changed unless finding an economic expansion "continuous and sustainable." The third and final data on U.S. GDP will be released on June 26. MarketWatch

The U.S. economy grew 2.4% in the first quarter - Expansion.com

How the International Monetary Fund work

To get in history, the International Monetary Fund was created in 1945 in the United States, and its main objectives are to promote international monetary cooperation, facilitate international trade, and reduce, ultimately, poverty. It also conducts economic policies international regulatory and conciliatory. It is part of the United Nations being an intergovernmental organization made up of 187 members. Headquartered in Washington DC, but has several offices around the world.

IMF Performance

• The main objective of the International Monetary Fund is to ensure the stability of the international monetary system that allows member countries, and therefore its citizens transact with each other, which makes maintaining a stable financial system, sustainable and balanced.
• For this, the International Monetary Fund provides funding to member countries to improve the margin of maneuver of each country in relation to its balance of payments. Between national authorities and the International Monetary Fund made an action plan, ensuring effective both for its compliance.
• It also provides technical support and does a great job as a consultant to member countries to develop effective economic policies, for example on tax administration, monetary and exchange rate policy, supervision and regulation of banking systems and the regulations governing them.

IMF Resources

• Currently, the countries to become members of the International Monetary Fund, quotas must deposit called "subscription fees", which are directly related to the economic capacity of the country.
• These assessments determine the economic aid that the Fund will provide each country as well as their right to vote in decisions about regulations. Thus, the higher the contribution of a country, the more power on joint decisions and have more financial aid when tackling a crisis.
• When a country needs financial aid, IMF gives 25% of its shares, with the country's commitment to return within a period ranging from 3 to 5 years. It is expected that the country must repay the loan as soon as possible to not leave without credit to other member countries.
• In the past, obtaining resources from the International Monetary Fund was made by obtaining the interest on loans outstanding, which made it less effective and solvent, then opting for the model that is currently running .

What are the criteria of banks to lend

Unlike what banks and preach the good credit history of a customer is the most important when lending to this, but taking into account factors that are related to the ability to repay the loan voluntarily or necessity, and that should be very clear.

The ability to pay

The business of a credit institution not sue their debtors and keep their property in the event of default, which also usually results in losses, but to collect the amount borrowed and the interest and fees on time.
For this reason, the main criterion for granting loans is that the applicant can meet the periodic installments. Generally, in the case of mortgages, the monthly fee should not exceed 35% of the borrower's monthly income and your household.
If it is a loan in the medium or long term, banks and fixing the type of employment contract that the customer has, in addition to the strength of the employer. If this does not convince them, may require hiring a payment protection insurance, for example.

The warranty

Second, to ensure that in case of default can recover the borrowed capital and interest, the guarantee granted is very important. If it comes to purchasing a home, precisely the mortgage on the property is essential because the loan shall not exceed 80% of the valuation of this.
In other cases, especially whether to grant loans for amounts higher or long periods, you may require the financial institution, for example, the guarantor, that is, someone other than the client is committed to your estate to pay the debt if it does not comply.
It is also usual for the agency credit loans is fixed in current assets of the applicant, that is, both money and other personal property such as stocks or jewelry that may eventually be left with the first, as a garment, and use it to collect the debt.

How to negotiate with the bank's best interest rate

If getting a loan is in itself complicated, get a good interest rate may seem impossible. However, if you follow certain trading strategies, the results will be more profitable than those which have been finalized to not use them.Trading ResourcesTo get a good interest rate is necessary to have two tools that support robust negotiation otherwise the lender will not even bother to raise a possible downgrade. It is important to feel in a position strong enough to require a modification of the standard conditions.
The first of them is to have a good credit history and be customer for several years. In this case the bank does not lose the customer interested and can offer good rates, in fact, experience shows that once a borrower has a loan with an institution, the tendency is to take it both accounts as the other products .
Additionally, it is critical information in advance, asking for contributions to various lending institutions, preferably in writing, about the interest rate they offer. Only in this way you can tell if the rate you are offering the bank concerned is outside of the standard in the market and if it is reasonable to request a rebate.LinkagesOne of the mechanisms currently used by lending institutions to lower the normal interest rate is called bonding, which is to ask the client to hire some additional products and maintain during the term of repayment of the loan.
Within these there is the payroll debit and utility bills, such as electricity, water, telephone and gas contracting life insurance and payment protection, hiring credit cards, and plans pensions and savings.
It is important to analyze how many basis points interest rate cut each product and determining whether compensated hire and if you are able to keep. In the case of savings funds, for example, the borrower is obliged to make monthly contributions.

tips on to help you save money

 

Then read ten helpful tips on to help you save money, either for special projects, education of your children, your retirement or family emergencies that may occur.Record your expenses for a monthSaving money is not as complicated as it seems, but before cutting your expenses, you need to know exactly what the money is going.To find out, write down your expenses for a month daily, weekly and monthly. You can do a mobile app or a book that you always carry in your bag. It is quite possible that you take a surprise.Once you realize what you spend the money, you can decide what things are necessary and what you can do without. That coffee shop you way to work or bottled water you usually drink, they can add a considerable amount at the end of the year, you could have saved with a little planning.You can for example, always go home with a bottle filled with tap water or buying you a thermos to take to work homemade coffee. If your work have a coffee machine, another option is to wait to get your job facilities to take the coveted coffee.What about that beautiful baby clothes shopping with your credit card? Think of the interest they charge you every month if you do not pay all of the purchases. Do not think that you can not enjoy your daily cup of coffee or dress your baby with these great fashion garments. Sure you can! The important thing is to find alternatives that allow you to save. Ask yourself the goal of spending a little less and save a little more each month. If you think so, maybe you'll have more motivation to avoid unnecessary expenses.You pay yourself firstThe secret to make saving a habit is to give priority to you. This does not mean you buy everything that catches your eye, but you will pay each month as you pay all your creditors usual.Ask yourself a realistic long-term and then "pay yourself" saving a fixed amount of money in a savings account or investment. Be sure to do the same day of each month (for example, every 10th of the month). If you wait until end of the month to see what's left, probably you will find that not much left.The easiest way to do this is to schedule an automatic transfer of a portion of your salary, however small, from your checking account to a savings account, a pension fund or a savings account for your children's college . Your goal is to make saving a habit so ingrained that it can not imagine your life without him. At the end of each month you will have the satisfaction of knowing you've got to protect your future and your family a little more than before.Plan your transfers in stagesMost pension funds, like the IRA (Individual stands for Individual Retirement Accounts and Pension Funds), savings accounts or other college savings options, allow you to choose the date for automatic transfer from your account. Plan these dates so that you know that you will not transfer money the same day to several accounts.If you are paid every two weeks, a transfer program every two weeks. If you are self-employed and the money will arrive irregularly, planning two dates in half of the month, if not usually pay most of your bills.Reduce your debtsSettle your debts is one of the best ways to save money, because the interest you pay on most loans (especially credit cards) is much higher than you earn on most savings accounts. So as you can reduce your credit card debt, student loans, loan to buy the car and any other debt you may have, so you can save more. The only large debt is reasonable to have for a long time is that of a home mortgage.For more information on how to pay your debts, see our guide.Become your own loan officerWhen you finish repaying a loan, continues to make monthly payments, but you! Schedule an automatic transfer of the same amount from your checking account to a savings account or an investment fund.Motivate yourself for a specific purposeDecide what you really want or need (a new couch, a new phone, a holiday) and see what it costs. Then set yourself a realistic goal, for example, take six months to save enough. Post photos of your goal in the refrigerator or in your wallet. Every time you will want to buy some new shoes or buy your child a toy more, you really do not need, look at the picture and ask yourself if you want this fad as much purpose for which you are saving.Open a savings account you can not touchSave for bigger expenses, like a down payment on a house or a car, opening CDs. These bank accounts pose no risk and offer a higher interest rate than normal savings accounts, but the money must remain in the certificate of deposit for a period of time (if you take it out ahead of time, you have to pay a penalty). That way, you can not touch it when you're feeling tempted to buy something you do not really need.Fill a jar with loose changePlace a large bottle narrow mouth (so you can not stick your hand) in a conspicuous place, and empty the coins there every night that's in your wallet. When the jar is full, you can make yourself packets (in banks will give the papers to wrap coins) or use the change counting machines found in some supermarkets, so you change coins for bills. After a few months, this may be enough pocket money to pay for a Christmas gift or membership in a gym, for example.Save the extra revenueEach time you receive a lot of extra money, for example, a tax refund, a payment had been delayed a lot, a bonus at work or a monetary gift, enter it in your savings account. Or, if you have debt, use it to pay your credit cards and loans, or to make an extra payment on your mortgage (money capital to reduce the amount of interest you pay over the years).Gasoline CutGasoline is expensive and the less you use, the more you save. If you can not buy a car that uses less fuel, is less often handle.Make turns with other moms and dads to pick up the kids from day care or with co-workers to get to and from work. Plan your errands so that you can make several in the same area at a time. Whenever you can, walk from one store and another or use public transport. And for your next vacation by car, consider traveling to a nearby location.